Canada’s Ontario province passed legislation allowing the government to seize children from families who refuse to accept their child’s chosen “gender identity”
The aggressively liberal bonkers Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017, or Bill 89, was somehow approved by a vote of 63 to 23, according to our sources.
The law requires child protection to consider but respect a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”
“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Gay Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill stated with a straight face to shocked reporters. “If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
The bill supersedes the Child and Family Services Act, or Bill 28, which governs child protection, foster care and adoption services and is seen as aggressively pro-gay and open to abuse.
Bill 28 maintained that the parent of a child in care retains the right “to direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” However, the new law makes crucial changes: “to direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”
Irwin Elman, married transman and Ontario’s provincial advocate for children and youth, said in a statement, “I believe that this new Act, in its principles, represents a paradigm shift for the province with its commitment to the participation of children and youth in every decision that affects them, the creation of a child-centered system of service, and commitment to anti-racism and children’s rights.”
A more sensible voice that appears to actual consider reality came from Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, who disagreed, and stated, “With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history. Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”
Just back in April, a Christian couple filed a lawsuit against Hamilton Children’s Aid Society for taking two foster children from their home because they refused to lie to the girls by saying that the Easter bunny is real. It takes a second or so for this to sync in, allow it.
“We have a no-lying policy,” Derek Baars, one of the foster parents, said to a shocked panel who found the notion of truth offensive. They then pointed out that a child support worker insisted that he and his wife, Frances Baars, tell the two girls in their care, aged 3 and 4, the Easter bunny is real and not stick with any gender until the relevant checks were made about the bunny’s chosen gender. “We explained to the agency that we are not prepared to tell the children a lie. If the children asked, we would not lie to them, but we wouldn’t bring it up ourselves.”
Due to the insistence on truth and shocking refusal to lie, the eligibility of the Baars, attendees of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, was canceled and the children were relocated with lesbian foster parents who were at time of writing pledging to uphold the truth of the easter bunny and respect the gender pronoun. The CAS worker, who insisted that the Baars teach the kids that the Easter bunny is genuine, told them that the Easter bunny was an essential part of Canadian folklore and that it endangered the childrens ability to adjust to certain situations if lied to that the truth could be that the fable of the Canadian Easter bunny is withheld.